中国科协创新驱动助力工程苏州对接活动结硕果

This article is about scheduling in networking. For scheduling in computing generally, see Scheduling (computing).

百度 那应该如何选择对联呢？小编就为你精选2018年春节对联大全，供大家挑选。

A network scheduler, also called packet scheduler, queueing discipline (qdisc) or queueing algorithm, is an arbiter on a node in a packet switching communication network. It manages the sequence of network packets in the transmit and receive queues of the protocol stack and network interface controller. There are several network schedulers available for the different operating systems, that implement many of the existing network scheduling algorithms.

Packets queuing in a FIFO (first in, first out) data structure.

The network scheduler logic decides which network packet to forward next. The network scheduler is associated with a queuing system, storing the network packets temporarily until they are transmitted. Systems may have a single or multiple queues in which case each may hold the packets of one flow, classification, or priority.

In some cases it may not be possible to schedule all transmissions within the constraints of the system. In these cases the network scheduler is responsible for deciding which traffic to forward and what gets dropped.

Terminology and responsibilities

A network scheduler may have responsibility in implementation of specific network traffic control initiatives. Network traffic control is an umbrella term for all measures aimed at reducing network congestion, latency and packet loss. Specifically, active queue management (AQM) is the selective dropping of queued network packets to achieve the larger goal of preventing excessive network congestion. The scheduler must choose which packets to drop. Traffic shaping smooths the bandwidth requirements of traffic flows by delaying transmission packets when they are queued in bursts. The scheduler decides the timing for the transmitted packets. Quality of service (QoS) is the prioritization of traffic based on service class (Differentiated services) or reserved connection (Integrated services).

Algorithms

In the course of time, many network queueing disciplines have been developed. Each of these provides specific reordering or dropping of network packets inside various transmit or receive buffers. Queuing disciplines are commonly used as attempts to compensate for various networking conditions, like reducing the latency for certain classes of network packets, and are generally used as part of QoS measures.

Classful queueing disciplines allow the creation of classes, which work like branches on a tree. Rules can then be set to filter packets into each class. Each class can itself have assigned other classful or classless queueing discipline. Classless queueing disciplines do not allow adding more queueing disciplines to it.

Examples of algorithms suitable for managing network traffic include:

Queueing Algorithms

Algorithm	Acronym	Type	HW Support
Generic cell rate algorithm	GCRA
CHOose and Kill for unresponsive flows	CHOKe	Classless
Controlled delay	CoDel	Classless
Common Applications Kept Enhanced	CAKE
Earliest TxTime First	ETF	Classless	Yes
First in, first out	FIFO	Classless
Fair queuing	FQ	Classless
Fair Queuing Controlled Delay	FQ-CoDel	Classless
Flow Queuing with Proportional Integral controller Enhanced	FQ-PIE	Classless
Generalized Random Early Detection	GRED	Classless
Heavy-Hitter Filter	HHF	Classless
Multiqueue Priority	MQ-PRIO	Classless	Yes
Multiqueue	MULTIQ	Classless	Yes
Network Emulator	NETEM	Classless
Proportional Integral controller-Enhanced	PIE	Classless
Random early detection	RED	Classless
Stochastic fair Blue	SFB	Classless
Stochastic Fairness Queueing	SFQ	Classless
Token Bucket Filter	TBF	Classless
Class-based queueing	CBQ	Classful
Credit-Based Shaper	CBS	Classful	Yes
Deficit round robin	DRR	Classful
Enhanced Transmission Selection	ETS	Classful
Hierarchical fair-service curve	HFSC	Classful
Hierarchical Token Bucket	HTB	Classful
Priority	PRIO	Classful
Quick Fair Queueing	QFQ	Classful
Time Aware Priority Shaper	TAPRIO	Classful	Yes

Several of the above have been implemented as Linux kernel modules and are freely available.

Bufferbloat

Bufferbloat is a phenomenon in packet-switched networks in which excess buffering of packets causes high latency and packet delay variation. Bufferbloat can be addressed by a network scheduler that strategically discards packets to avoid an unnecessarily high buffering backlog. Examples include CoDel, FQ-CoDel and random early detection.

Implementations

Linux kernel

The Linux kernel's packet scheduler is part of the network stack, together with netfilter, nftables, and Berkeley Packet Filter.

The Linux kernel packet scheduler is an integral part of the Linux kernel's network stack and manages the transmit and receive ring buffers of all NICs.

The packet scheduler is configured using the utility called tc (short for traffic control). As the default queuing discipline, the packet scheduler uses a FIFO implementation called pfifo_fast, although systemd since its version 217 changes the default queuing discipline to fq_codel.

The ifconfig and ip utilities enable system administrators to configure the buffer sizes txqueuelen and rxqueuelen for each device separately in terms of number of Ethernet frames regardless of their size. The Linux kernel's network stack contains several other buffers, which are not managed by the network scheduler.

Berkeley Packet Filter filters can be attached to the packet scheduler's classifiers. The eBPF functionality brought by version 4.1 of the Linux kernel in 2015 extends the classic BPF programmable classifiers to eBPF. These can be compiled using the LLVM eBPF backend and loaded into a running kernel using the tc utility.

BSD and OpenBSD

ALTQ is the implementation of a network scheduler for BSDs. As of OpenBSD version 5.5 ALTQ was replaced by the HFSC scheduler.

Cell-Free Network Scheduling

Schedulers in communication networks manage resource allocation, including packet prioritization, timing, and resource distribution. Advanced implementations increasingly leverage artificial intelligence to address the complexities of modern network configurations. For instance, a supervised neural network (NN)-based scheduler has been introduced in cell-free networks to efficiently handle interactions between multiple radio units (RUs) and user equipment (UEs). This approach reduces computational complexity while optimizing latency, throughput, and resource allocation, making it a promising solution for beyond-5G networks.

See also

• Queueing theory
• Statistical time-division multiplexing
• Type of service